The projections seem overall a little too good so as a test I totaled the rest of season projections for the entire league (all pitchers, not just top pitchers). For the rest of season I am showing a total ERA of 3.55. This is compared to a 3.74 ERA for the entire league in 2014. Shouldn't the projections for this season be roughly pegged to last season? Is there a reason to think that ERA will improve that much? In fact, there hasn't been a league wide ERA that good since 1976. I haven't analyzed all the other stats in detail but I suspect there is similar total bias in favor of improved results. Even more dramatically is the difference in the weekly projections. When I run the projections for all pitchers for the next 7 days (4/13 to 4/19) I get a total ERA of 3.23. I can concede that in a given day, especially opening day when we have mostly aces pitching, the ERA could be much different than average. But over an entire week I would think this would roughly even out for the entire league so I am wondering why the ERA is so much better for a week as opposed to the entire season. Also, when I run for just SP during the week I get an ERA of 3.23 while RP pitchers have an ERA of 3.24 for the week -- almost the same. This contradicts the well established record that relievers will have a better ERA than starters. I hope this isn't nitpicky but it impacts my analysis and I feel the need to make adjustments to the projections based on more realistic expectations. Any explanation for my observations would be appreciated. 0% Agree (0 votes) |