I noticed that some of the team's projected runs don't add up to the vegas over/unders. Some by quite a bit, such as COL/STL. For example, sum of the runs for COL + STL starters add up to 9.05 (4.18 + 4.87) while the over/under is only 8. Any reason why that is? Also, the sums are not consistently higher than the O/U either, for example, sum of runs for NYY/ARI game is 4.33 + 4.29 = 8.62 while the over/under for that game is 9. 0% Agree (0 votes) |
Don't forget that the Vegas lines aren't 100% accurate. Just like pricing is off in DFS on players from time to time lines aren't set correctly, which is why there are people who are able to make a living betting on sports games 0% Agree (0 votes) |
We don't force our totals to match the odds though we do visually compare the two. The total runs of all hitters/pitchers will be a little high since we give all bench players some playing time. 0% Agree (0 votes) |
Also the purpose of the Vegas lines isn't to be an accurate measure of a games expected outcome as much as to entice equal betting from both sides of the line. 0% Agree (0 votes) |
Thanks, all fair points. About kslight's comment about total runs being usually higher than vegas, that doesn't seem to be the case as my example for NYY/ARI shows. One who relies on vegas info on runs would be stacking NYY tonight for sure, but with bbm projections one can look elsewhere for better options. 0% Agree (0 votes) |
It looks like you may be totaling the starters only for NYY (which would make sense)? Is that the case, or are you viewing non-starters too? 0% Agree (0 votes) |
o right... yea starters only. 0% Agree (0 votes) |
With that said the top of the Yankees lineup does present some value anyway. All three of the outfielders are in a pretty good spot IMO 0% Agree (0 votes) |