Hey guys, tried out the draft track yesterday in a mock. Here's the team I was able to put together, let me know what you guys think. Any feedback is appreciated, as I'm still a bit of a newb. I picked 11th of 12. If it helps to post the order I drafted in, let me know. I'll admit to not being too famiiar with some of my deeper picks, but they seemed like solid choices given the z-scores. And after how the first few rounds went, I switched to a firm punt steals strategy, though I guess that's obvious.
Hitters
|
|
1 |
8 |
19 (+11) |
1.46 |
1.14 |
+0.32 |
Beltre, Adrian |
|
TEX |
3B |
146 |
|
567 |
91 |
176 |
125 |
34 |
67 |
0.310 |
34 |
1 |
0.908 |
1.59 |
1.51 |
2.63 |
-1.08 |
1.02 |
0.90 |
1.16 |
1.37 |
|
|
2 |
21 |
48 (+27) |
1.00 |
0.75 |
+0.25 |
Butler, Billy |
|
KC |
1B |
159 |
|
590 |
91 |
183 |
106 |
53 |
101 |
0.310 |
25 |
2 |
0.877 |
1.66 |
0.51 |
1.55 |
-0.96 |
1.00 |
1.25 |
0.10 |
0.91 |
|
|
3 |
31 |
150 (+119) |
0.75 |
0.57 |
+0.18 |
Markakis, Nick |
|
BAL |
OF |
157 |
|
623 |
93 |
190 |
85 |
61 |
73 |
0.305 |
17 |
6 |
0.833 |
1.42 |
-0.44 |
0.35 |
-0.67 |
1.13 |
1.60 |
0.98 |
0.22 |
|
|
3 |
33 |
53 (+20) |
0.74 |
0.69 |
+0.05 |
Cespedes, Yoenis |
|
OAK |
OF |
146 |
|
566 |
89 |
170 |
100 |
49 |
105 |
0.300 |
26 |
18 |
0.881 |
0.98 |
0.61 |
1.23 |
0.34 |
0.81 |
0.62 |
-0.02 |
0.95 |
|
|
4 |
42 |
73 (+31) |
0.61 |
0.54 |
+0.07 |
Hill, Aaron |
|
ARI |
2B |
144 |
|
568 |
84 |
167 |
93 |
45 |
76 |
0.295 |
24 |
14 |
0.859 |
0.68 |
0.34 |
0.85 |
0.04 |
0.41 |
0.50 |
0.89 |
0.61 |
|
|
6 |
67 |
96 (+29) |
0.31 |
0.26 |
+0.04 |
Prado, Martin |
|
ARI |
2B/SS/3B/OF |
147 |
|
601 |
82 |
181 |
72 |
49 |
64 |
0.301 |
12 |
13 |
0.802 |
1.11 |
-0.97 |
-0.33 |
-0.03 |
0.22 |
1.15 |
1.28 |
-0.30 |
|
|
7 |
77 |
89 (+12) |
0.20 |
0.03 |
+0.16 |
Martinez, Victor |
|
DET |
C |
138 |
|
506 |
71 |
153 |
86 |
41 |
46 |
0.302 |
15 |
0 |
0.809 |
0.99 |
-0.72 |
0.42 |
-1.10 |
-0.77 |
-0.21 |
1.82 |
-0.15 |
|
|
7 |
79 |
200 (+121) |
0.17 |
0.01 |
+0.16 |
Morse, Mike |
|
SEA |
OF |
139 |
|
525 |
76 |
155 |
88 |
29 |
122 |
0.295 |
27 |
1 |
0.848 |
0.63 |
0.65 |
0.51 |
-1.08 |
-0.34 |
-0.11 |
-0.56 |
0.39 |
|
|
10 |
114 |
227 (+113) |
-0.06 |
-0.03 |
-0.03 |
Werth, Jayson |
|
WAS |
OF |
151 |
|
578 |
90 |
159 |
72 |
82 |
140 |
0.275 |
24 |
16 |
0.839 |
-0.56 |
0.33 |
-0.37 |
0.21 |
0.91 |
0.09 |
-1.14 |
0.30 |
|
|
11 |
132 |
165 (+33) |
-0.15 |
-0.26 |
+0.10 |
Ethier, Andre |
|
LAD |
OF |
151 |
|
538 |
70 |
154 |
85 |
56 |
115 |
0.287 |
18 |
2 |
0.816 |
0.18 |
-0.30 |
0.39 |
-0.97 |
-0.81 |
-0.13 |
-0.34 |
-0.06 |
|
|
12 |
133 |
210 (+77) |
-0.19 |
-0.19 |
+0.01 |
Cuddyer, Michael |
|
COL |
1B/OF |
146 |
|
531 |
76 |
146 |
82 |
46 |
102 |
0.275 |
20 |
11 |
0.806 |
-0.51 |
-0.08 |
0.22 |
-0.25 |
-0.27 |
-0.54 |
0.08 |
-0.22 |
|
|
14 |
163 |
138 (-25) |
-0.31 |
-0.40 |
+0.09 |
Napoli, Mike |
|
BOS |
C/1B |
120 |
|
431 |
76 |
114 |
80 |
62 |
127 |
0.265 |
29 |
1 |
0.888 |
-0.88 |
0.96 |
0.06 |
-1.02 |
-0.31 |
-2.09 |
-0.73 |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.50 |
3.12 |
+1.38 |
Avg Stats/Total Values |
|
|
|
1744 |
|
6,624 |
990 |
1,948 |
1,075 |
607 |
1,137 |
0.294 |
273 |
85 |
0.846 |
7.27 |
2.40 |
7.52 |
-6.58 |
3.01 |
3.02 |
3.52 |
4.75 |
Pitchers
|
|
1 |
2 |
14 (+12) |
2.02 |
2.02 |
0.00 |
Kershaw, Clayton |
|
LAD |
SP |
32 |
|
229.3 |
194 |
74 |
68 |
59 |
237 |
14 |
2.68 |
0 |
17 |
1.10 |
1 |
4 |
3.11 |
-0.44 |
1.47 |
2.62 |
2.03 |
2.67 |
2.67 |
|
|
3 |
26 |
64 (+38) |
0.82 |
0.82 |
0.00 |
Sale, Chris |
|
CHW |
SP |
31 |
|
205.0 |
186 |
83 |
76 |
57 |
207 |
21 |
3.35 |
0 |
14 |
1.19 |
1 |
2 |
0.98 |
-0.44 |
0.63 |
1.05 |
1.38 |
1.07 |
1.07 |
|
|
3 |
35 |
130 (+95) |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.00 |
Fister, Doug |
|
DET |
SP |
32 |
|
213.2 |
207 |
89 |
82 |
45 |
163 |
19 |
3.46 |
0 |
15 |
1.18 |
1 |
2 |
0.69 |
-0.44 |
1.08 |
1.16 |
0.41 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
|
|
7 |
76 |
181 (+105) |
0.21 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
Bailey, Homer |
|
CIN |
SP |
31 |
|
198.9 |
198 |
93 |
86 |
50 |
164 |
24 |
3.88 |
0 |
14 |
1.25 |
1 |
2 |
-0.44 |
-0.44 |
0.74 |
0.11 |
0.41 |
0.53 |
0.53 |
|
|
8 |
90 |
242 (+152) |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
Hammel, Jason |
|
BAL |
SP |
32 |
|
206.7 |
198 |
94 |
86 |
69 |
170 |
19 |
3.75 |
0 |
13 |
1.29 |
1 |
2 |
-0.10 |
-0.44 |
0.48 |
-0.55 |
0.56 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
|
|
9 |
107 |
258 (+151) |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
0.00 |
Milone, Tom |
|
OAK |
SP |
31 |
|
189.7 |
193 |
87 |
80 |
36 |
135 |
21 |
3.80 |
0 |
13 |
1.21 |
0 |
1 |
-0.22 |
-0.44 |
0.39 |
0.67 |
-0.22 |
-0.14 |
-0.14 |
|
|
9 |
108 |
242 (+134) |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
0.00 |
Maholm, Paul |
|
ATL |
SP |
32 |
|
206.7 |
209 |
98 |
91 |
57 |
142 |
21 |
3.94 |
0 |
15 |
1.29 |
1 |
2 |
-0.63 |
-0.44 |
0.84 |
-0.55 |
-0.05 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
|
|
11 |
128 |
231 (+103) |
-0.15 |
-0.15 |
0.00 |
Buehrle, Mark |
|
TOR |
SP |
32 |
|
210.0 |
225 |
107 |
99 |
44 |
126 |
26 |
4.23 |
0 |
13 |
1.28 |
1 |
2 |
-1.44 |
-0.44 |
0.40 |
-0.42 |
-0.42 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
|
|
13 |
156 |
136 (-20) |
-0.27 |
-0.27 |
0.00 |
Romo, Sergio |
|
SF |
RP |
64 |
|
62.3 |
50 |
17 |
16 |
12 |
75 |
4 |
2.29 |
37 |
4 |
1.00 |
0 |
0 |
1.16 |
2.45 |
-2.08 |
1.21 |
-1.55 |
-1.55 |
-1.55 |
|
|
18 |
207 |
161 (-46) |
-0.45 |
-0.45 |
0.00 |
Holland, Greg |
|
KC |
RP |
59 |
|
60.6 |
45 |
18 |
17 |
26 |
79 |
3 |
2.53 |
34 |
3 |
1.17 |
0 |
0 |
0.95 |
2.22 |
-2.14 |
0.40 |
-1.46 |
-1.55 |
-1.55 |
|
|
27 |
324 |
224 (-100) |
-0.77 |
-0.77 |
0.00 |
Marmol, Carlos |
|
CHC |
RP |
58 |
|
57.6 |
44 |
24 |
22 |
38 |
76 |
4 |
3.43 |
29 |
4 |
1.42 |
0 |
0 |
0.22 |
1.84 |
-2.07 |
-0.73 |
-1.53 |
-1.55 |
-1.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.16 |
2.16 |
0.00 |
Avg Stats/Total Values |
|
|
|
434 |
|
1,840.1 |
1,751 |
785 |
723 |
492 |
1,574 |
176 |
3.53 |
101 |
125 |
1.22 |
6 |
17 |
4.27 |
2.99 |
-0.25 |
4.95 |
-0.43 |
1.77 |
1.77
|
0% Agree (0 votes) |
The team looks great, and the only thing I would change is swapping Marmol for a mediocre starter. That'll put your Wins and SO value above average but still keep your saves at an above-average level.
0% Agree (0 votes) |
Eight starters should be plenty. The bigger problem is that your end-of-the rotation guys are all very low in K/9. Your ratios are in phenomenal shape, so I'd be sacrificing a bit there for (much) more K/9 potential than you'll get from guys like Maholm and Buehrle, particularly since they aren't helping your ratios in the first place. That's a really good offense... if guys stay healthy.
0% Agree (0 votes) |
Awesome, thanks guys. I was letting myself get too caught up in the 'unsexiness' of my offense, but I recognize that's the exact sort of thing these tools are meant to help me shape.
0% Agree (0 votes) |