Stashing Bonifacio in my roto 12-teamer (OBP over BA) for SBs. Recently made a play for C. Gomez, rendering the SB need a bit less urgent. I'm trying to get a feel for how Bonifacio's role/PT will shake out given the (potential) emergence of Alcantara and the general muddiness of the Cub's infield. Projections here are pretty down on K. Wong, but I have a hard time seeing myself dropping Wong, a potentially much better across-the-board play, to activate one-trick Bonifacio. I'm particularly uneasy about Bonifacio because of the potential OBP hit--my stretch run for the title looks to involve a fairly heated OBP dog fight. Thoughts? 12 Teams | 13 Hitters Per Team [5 Active = HR RBI SB R OBP] | 9 Pitchers Per Team [5 Active = W SV ERA WHIP SO] 1 | 7 | 1.33 | Gomez, Carlos | | MIL | OF | 62 | | 254 | 40 | 76 | 37 | 19 | 66 | 0.299 | 12 | 19 | 0.359 | 1.12 | 0.98 | 2.32 | 1.57 | 0.68 | 1 | 12 | 0.92 | Abreu, Jose | | CHW | 1B | 62 | | 237 | 36 | 66 | 42 | 21 | 58 | 0.279 | 16 | 1 | 0.353 | 2.40 | 1.68 | -0.74 | 0.93 | 0.35 | 2 | 16 | 0.81 | Pence, Hunter | | SF | OF | 67 | | 248 | 36 | 76 | 40 | 23 | 49 | 0.304 | 10 | 6 | 0.367 | 0.74 | 1.40 | 0.12 | 0.82 | 0.99 | 2 | 19 | 0.74 | Rizzo, Anthony | | CHC | 1B | 67 | | 242 | 37 | 67 | 35 | 32 | 50 | 0.276 | 13 | 1 | 0.367 | 1.52 | 0.79 | -0.66 | 1.05 | 0.99 | 3 | 28 | 0.45 | Polanco, Gregory | | PIT | OF | 63 | | 264 | 40 | 75 | 25 | 22 | 48 | 0.285 | 7 | 13 | 0.348 | -0.28 | -0.57 | 1.38 | 1.55 | 0.16 | 3 | 34 | 0.41 | Holliday, Matt | | STL | OF | 62 | | 232 | 35 | 65 | 31 | 32 | 38 | 0.282 | 8 | 2 | 0.383 | 0.11 | 0.19 | -0.61 | 0.77 | 1.56 | 4 | 42 | 0.33 | Upton, Justin | | ATL | OF | 63 | | 220 | 31 | 60 | 34 | 24 | 60 | 0.273 | 11 | 4 | 0.350 | 0.98 | 0.65 | -0.21 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 6 | 64 | 0.02 | Sandoval, Pablo | | SF | 3B | 63 | | 236 | 30 | 68 | 37 | 19 | 37 | 0.288 | 8 | 0 | 0.344 | 0.09 | 1.02 | -0.91 | -0.10 | -0.01 | 6 | 67 | 0.00 | Heyward, Jason | | ATL | OF | 63 | | 220 | 28 | 58 | 28 | 27 | 42 | 0.266 | 8 | 7 | 0.353 | -0.02 | -0.17 | 0.23 | -0.35 | 0.33 | 7 | 84 | -0.15 | Pedroia, Dustin | | BOS | 2B | 67 | | 257 | 34 | 70 | 29 | 28 | 33 | 0.273 | 4 | 5 | 0.346 | -1.21 | -0.08 | -0.10 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 13 | 145 | -0.70 | Bonifacio, Emilio | | CHC | 2B/OF | 58 | | 238 | 28 | 62 | 14 | 19 | 52 | 0.262 | 1 | 16 | 0.318 | -1.98 | -1.98 | 1.92 | -0.36 | -1.08 | 16 | 181 | -0.90 | Ramos, Wilson | | WAS | C | 54 | | 169 | 19 | 45 | 23 | 13 | 28 | 0.265 | 7 | 0 | 0.318 | -0.19 | -0.88 | -0.87 | -1.78 | -0.76 | 16 | 186 | -0.93 | Escobar, Alcides | | KC | SS | 70 | | 212 | 19 | 57 | 21 | 9 | 30 | 0.270 | 2 | 14 | 0.307 | -1.78 | -1.14 | 1.46 | -1.80 | -1.39 | 23 | 266 | -1.50 | Wong, Kolten | | STL | 2B | 41 | | 137 | 12 | 34 | 13 | 9 | 20 | 0.251 | 2 | 7 | 0.304 | -1.72 | -2.19 | 0.34 | -2.95 | -0.95 | |
| | 0.90 | Avg Stats/Total Values | | | | 862 | | 3,167 | 426 | 880 | 407 | 297 | 612 | 0.278 | 109 | 95 | 0.347 | -0.22 | -0.30 | 3.67 | -0.06 | 1.43 | | | 0.26 | Avg Stats/Total Values (active) | | | | 742 | | 2,676 | 358 | 742 | 356 | 259 | 494 | 0.277 | 96 | 60 | 0.348 | 0.65 | 0.70 | -0.57 | -1.26 | 1.81 |
1 | 1 | 1.63 | Kershaw, Clayton | | LAD | SP | 13 | | 89.6 | 69 | 25 | 23 | 21 | 98 | 5 | 2.30 | 7 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.60 | 2.96 | 2.73 | 1.74 | 2 | 16 | 0.48 | Uehara, Koji | | BOS | RP | 29 | | 29.0 | 19 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 37 | 3 | 2.17 | 2 | 14 | 0.80 | -1.42 | 1.85 | 1.08 | 1.83 | -0.92 | 4 | 40 | -0.02 | Betances, Dellin | | NYY | RP | 28 | | 36.9 | 26 | 10 | 9 | 16 | 56 | 3 | 2.20 | 3 | 0 | 1.14 | -1.03 | -0.60 | 1.35 | 0.26 | -0.08 | 4 | 41 | -0.02 | Roark, Tanner | | WAS | SP/RP | 12 | | 70.1 | 64 | 28 | 26 | 17 | 51 | 6 | 3.32 | 6 | 0 | 1.15 | 0.61 | -0.60 | -0.19 | 0.36 | -0.30 | 4 | 44 | -0.06 | Wood, Alex | | ATL | SP/RP | 12 | | 77.5 | 77 | 30 | 27 | 23 | 76 | 7 | 3.17 | 6 | 0 | 1.30 | 0.72 | -0.60 | 0.21 | -1.39 | 0.79 | 4 | 47 | -0.08 | Keuchel, Dallas | | HOU | SP/RP | 13 | | 91.2 | 90 | 36 | 33 | 24 | 75 | 7 | 3.25 | 5 | 0 | 1.26 | 0.56 | -0.60 | -0.02 | -1.08 | 0.75 | 5 | 53 | -0.12 | Papelbon, Jonathan | | PHI | RP | 27 | | 26.8 | 23 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 26 | 2 | 3.02 | 2 | 14 | 1.10 | -1.53 | 1.76 | 0.21 | 0.35 | -1.41 | 6 | 61 | -0.17 | Benoit, Joaquin | | SD | RP | 29 | | 28.0 | 19 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 32 | 2 | 2.63 | 2 | 3 | 0.97 | -1.22 | -0.04 | 0.60 | 0.96 | -1.17 | 6 | 66 | -0.22 | Smith, Joe | | LAA | RP | 31 | | 28.6 | 24 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 26 | 2 | 3.17 | 2 | 13 | 1.19 | -1.28 | 1.56 | 0.08 | -0.01 | -1.43 | 7 | 77 | -0.27 | Weaver, Jered | | LAA | SP | 13 | | 81.1 | 72 | 38 | 35 | 22 | 63 | 10 | 3.91 | 5 | 0 | 1.16 | 0.54 | -0.60 | -1.87 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 7 | 78 | -0.27 | Liriano, Francisco | | PIT | SP | 12 | | 75.6 | 68 | 31 | 29 | 32 | 76 | 7 | 3.43 | 6 | 0 | 1.33 | 0.72 | -0.60 | -0.48 | -1.77 | 0.77 | 7 | 80 | -0.29 | Allen, Cody | | CLE | RP | 30 | | 28.1 | 23 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 34 | 3 | 3.02 | 2 | 8 | 1.22 | -1.25 | 0.81 | 0.22 | -0.14 | -1.07 | 20 | 234 | -0.83 | Holland, Derek | | TEX | SP | 7 | | 42.2 | 41 | 20 | 18 | 13 | 36 | 5 | 3.87 | 3 | 0 | 1.28 | -1.01 | -0.60 | -0.91 | -0.67 | -0.97 | |
| | -0.23 | Avg Stats/Total Values | | | | 256 | | 704.8 | 616 | 265 | 244 | 208 | 686 | 61 | 3.11 | 49 | 52 | 1.17 | -4.26 | 1.14 | 3.24 | 1.80 | -3.09 | | | -0.16 | Avg Stats/Total Values (active) | | | | 145 | | 149.5 | 116 | 48 | 45 | 47 | 180 | 12 | 2.68 | 10 | 49 | 1.09 | -6.50 | 5.38 | 2.94 | 2.29 | -4.90 |
0% Agree (0 votes) |
Do you need Bonifacio's SBs? He looks like he would hurt your team more than help. Assuming your rosters are up-to-date, would stashing Victorino (could be back right after the break) be a better bet than Bonafacio? 0% Agree (0 votes) |
I've thought about stashing Victorino (or Fowler, recently dropped). My problem there is that I don't have anywhere to play them, barring injury, whereas the MI spot has been a revolving door for me all year. Still, better safe than sorry--can't hurt to have a backup stashed. Might stick with Wong, though, in MI, at least until further notice. Appreciate the response. Cheers. 0% Agree (0 votes) |
That looks reasonable plus Wong has been batting 2nd lately so if can continue doing that, he'll get a nice value boost. 0% Agree (0 votes) |